Back to catalogue
Blended Learning

Matrix Reloaded.

A six-month blended learning programme designed to equip senior leaders and managers at Places for People with the skills to operate effectively within a newly adopted matrix structure, supporting a fundamental shift in organisational culture and operating model.

91%
Programme completion
rate across all
leadership tiers
Client
Places for People
Year
2024
Duration
6 months
My Role
Learning Experience Designer
Matrix Reloaded hero
Challenge Icon

The Challenge.

Places for People was transitioning from a traditional hierarchical structure to a dynamic matrix model. Leaders at all levels lacked the specific skills, mindset, and confidence to navigate dotted-line reporting, manage conflicting priorities, and drive collective outcomes. Without targeted intervention, the risk of confusion, reduced productivity, and siloed working threatened the strategic value of the restructure.

01

Mindset Shift at Scale

Existing operational habits were deeply embedded. The challenge was not information transfer but genuine behavioural and cultural change across multiple leadership tiers simultaneously.

02

Complexity and Ambiguity

Matrix structures introduce inherent ambiguity. Leaders needed practical tools and frameworks to manage competing priorities and maintain accountability without the clarity of traditional reporting lines.

Methodology Icon

Methodology.

Adult learning principles anchored the design from the outset, with learner autonomy, immediate role relevance, and practical application at the centre. An iterative, feedback-driven development cycle kept the programme aligned to evolving organisational realities throughout the six months.

  1. Step 01

    Microlearning Design

    Complex matrix concepts were broken into digestible, bite-sized modules to support comprehension, retention, and application within the constraints of busy leadership schedules.

  2. Step 02

    Blended Delivery

    Self-paced online modules were combined with live virtual instructor-led sessions and on-the-job application exercises, addressing varied learning preferences and the need for both conceptual and practical development.

  3. Step 03

    Social Learning Integration

    Dedicated Microsoft Teams channels and discussion forums embedded peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, creating a community of practice across leadership cohorts.

  4. Step 04

    Iterative Design

    Continuous feedback through surveys and focus groups informed content refinements throughout the programme lifecycle, ensuring ongoing relevance as the organisation evolved.

Approach Icon

The Approach.

The programme was designed as an organisational change enabler, not simply a training event. Sustained stakeholder engagement, data-informed iteration, and a strong community component were the pillars of programme delivery.

  1. Stakeholder Partnership

    Senior business partners and leadership were engaged from inception, with consistent communication ensuring alignment, accountability, and programme credibility throughout.

  2. Practical Application Focus

    Content covered matrix reporting lines, influence without authority, managing ambiguity, and shared accountability, grounding theory in the day-to-day reality of each leadership tier.

  3. Data-Driven Improvement

    Engagement data and assessment results from MS Forms informed continuous improvement cycles, enabling the programme to adapt to emerging needs in real time.

  4. Flexible Architecture

    The programme structure was built to accommodate the inherent unpredictability of a major organisational transition, with flexibility baked in from the design stage.

Impact Icon

The Impact.

91% of participants completed the full six-month programme across all three leadership tiers. Post-programme surveys showed 74% of leaders reporting greater confidence navigating matrix working, 68% citing clearer accountability in cross-functional teams, and an average satisfaction score of 4.4 out of 5.

91%
Programme completion rate

74%
Reported improved confidence in matrix working

68%
Reported clearer cross-functional accountability

4.4/5
Average programme satisfaction score